When No Means No - A Guide To Rejections
Maybe you can help me. I received a rejection on a query today that read:
“We reviewed your project and find it to be drivel. There is no chance on this great earth that we would publish it. We won’t even waste our time to request a partial. Perhaps someone once told you that your writing showed promise. We want to assure you that they were simply being polite. You should abandon all efforts toward publication. Cease and desist immediately. We are using your SASE to return this reply because we wouldn’t even invest the cost of postage in this crap.”
I don’t know. What do you think they mean by drivel, exactly? Do you think they might be interested in another manuscript I’ve been shopping around?
Seriously, I’ve never really received a letter like this, I’m just playing up the desperation most of us run into at some point or another when we are clawing our way out of the submissions trench, looking for the first ray of light we’ve seen since being buried alive. How do we get so low that we read between the lines of a form rejection to see if they really wanted to send us more than a form rejection…maybe they wanted to send us a personal rejection. And that kind of rejection is far better than the form. Oh, wait…no matter how you slice it they are saying NO! They may put a little extra time in to craft an eloquent NO. Or they may just say NO in such a round about way that you wonder if they really are saying NO. But if they aren’t saying yes…they are saying N-O.
Does this post seem familiar? You've got a good memory. I'm re-posting an old post of mine.